October 10, 2006Golden Oldie TimeFrom Bush's 2002 SOTU: We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side. I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. Bush Doctrine, RIP. Posted by Gregory at October 10, 2006 03:48 AM Comments
look, Bush never cared about any of that stuff. He didn't care about North Korea--he had to ask Bandar why it mattered. He didn't care about Iran--he and Ollie North and the entire Bush I team were happy to do business with the mullahs. There was only one thing Bush II cared about, and that was settling a personal score with Saddam. It was entirely a matter of a family grudge. And Bush was too weak to get revenge on his own, so he wanted to use your tax dollars and your children's lives to settle it. So he lied. From the moment he hit the campaign trail in '98 he was lying about his intentions vis a vis Iraq. All this stuff about protecting America--it was all bunk, from the very start. He didn't give a damn about protecting America--"you've covered your ass" was his response to the briefing telling him that Al Qaeda was about to strike before 9/11. So the fact that every move he took has empowered North Korea? That's no surprise either. He took his eye off North Korea, and let them get away with building a bomb, just like he took his eye off Bin Laden and let him get away. So here we are, six years later. Bin Laden still on the loose. NoKo with a bomb they never had to have. And Iran riding higher than it has ever been in the Middle East--since the time of Xerxes, give or take a century. This guy has been the most monumental failure in American history. The only bigger losers are the people who supported him all these years. Posted by: kid bitzer at October 10, 2006 04:18 AM | Permalink to this commentLet's see... Bush wanted revenge for his daddy's humiliation. No, wait, he wanted to humiliate daddy by succeeding where 41 failed. No, I think he was trying to control oil resources so that central banks wouldn't switch their reserve currency to Euros. Whoops, that makes zero sense, I guess he was finding a way to get troops out of Saudi Arabia where they were inflaming the Muslims. Or maybe he was going to war in order to inflame the Muslims and help kickstart the Bibical apocalypse. My personal favorite is this: A few days after 9-11, the FP team is sitting around brooding about the terrible situation. "This is awful." says Rummy, "We're at war, and we can't find the enemy. The worst part is, this war will be fought on American soil. We can never protect everything." And Bush (who did not get to be the most powerful man in the world by being an idiot) says, "Hey Dick, what's going on in Iraq?" And the Vice President says "Iraq? Why nothing. That son of a bitch Saddam is all bottled up, we're just waiting till he dies." And our President gets a gleam in his eye and says: "Why don't we hold the war in his piss ant country?"
We can speculate endlessly on why Bush made the terrible mistake of invading iraq. Maybe in a few years we'll get access to records of various meetings where it got discussed, things that are not available now. The bottom line is nobody knows why Bush did it, or if they have some sort of evidence they aren't allowed to say. And it was a terrible mistake that may keep hurting us for generations. actually Greg, were I you I'd have bolded the two previous sentences. I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. they speak more volumes than the subsequent ones. Posted by: Aziz at October 10, 2006 03:23 PM | Permalink to this commentIts difficult to understand the actions of a vanglorious, far less than rational leader who is the scion of a political dynasty and who appears bent on deliberately alienating and isolating his nation from the rest of the world. And its tough to understand Kim Jong II as well. Posted by: p.lukasiak at October 11, 2006 01:59 PM | Permalink to this comment |
About Belgravia Dispatch
Gregory Djerejian, an international lawyer and business executive, comments intermittently on global politics, finance & diplomacy at this site. The views expressed herein are solely his own and do not represent those of any organization. More About the Author Email the Author Recent Entries
Lunch w/ the FT...
Robert Strange McNamara Biden on Israel/Iran Mea Culpa (Part II) Something of A Mea Culpa Search
The News
Financial Times
New York Times Wall Street Journal The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation Real Clear Politics Le Figaro Le Monde El Pais Pravda The Blogs
Across the Aisle
Marc Ambinder American Footprints The American Scene Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Democracy Arsensal Daniel Drezner Washington Monthly James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Huffington Post Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Marc Lynch Josh Marshall Progressive Realist Obsidian Wings George Packer Gideon Rachman Andrew Sullivan Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy Steve Walt James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias Foreign Affairs Commentariat
Law & Finance
Barron's
Bloomberg Bull and Bear Wise Calculated Risk Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Bruce MacEwen Barry Ritholz Nouriel Roubini Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog Seeking Alpha The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance Think Tanks
Security
Books
American Scholar
LRB NYRB NYT Book Review Paris Review TLS Granta Grand Street Arts & Letters Daily TNR's The Book The City
Curbed
Eater Gothamist NY Magazine NY Post NY Press New York Observer Tribeca Trib Vanishing NY Village Voice Epicurean Corner
Archives
|
|||