October 10, 2006Golden Oldie TimeFrom Bush's 2002 SOTU: We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side. I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. Bush Doctrine, RIP. Posted by Gregory at October 10, 2006 03:48 AM Comments
look, Bush never cared about any of that stuff. He didn't care about North Korea--he had to ask Bandar why it mattered. He didn't care about Iran--he and Ollie North and the entire Bush I team were happy to do business with the mullahs. There was only one thing Bush II cared about, and that was settling a personal score with Saddam. It was entirely a matter of a family grudge. And Bush was too weak to get revenge on his own, so he wanted to use your tax dollars and your children's lives to settle it. So he lied. From the moment he hit the campaign trail in '98 he was lying about his intentions vis a vis Iraq. All this stuff about protecting America--it was all bunk, from the very start. He didn't give a damn about protecting America--"you've covered your ass" was his response to the briefing telling him that Al Qaeda was about to strike before 9/11. So the fact that every move he took has empowered North Korea? That's no surprise either. He took his eye off North Korea, and let them get away with building a bomb, just like he took his eye off Bin Laden and let him get away. So here we are, six years later. Bin Laden still on the loose. NoKo with a bomb they never had to have. And Iran riding higher than it has ever been in the Middle East--since the time of Xerxes, give or take a century. This guy has been the most monumental failure in American history. The only bigger losers are the people who supported him all these years. Posted by: kid bitzer at October 10, 2006 04:18 AM | Permalink to this commentLet's see... Bush wanted revenge for his daddy's humiliation. No, wait, he wanted to humiliate daddy by succeeding where 41 failed. No, I think he was trying to control oil resources so that central banks wouldn't switch their reserve currency to Euros. Whoops, that makes zero sense, I guess he was finding a way to get troops out of Saudi Arabia where they were inflaming the Muslims. Or maybe he was going to war in order to inflame the Muslims and help kickstart the Bibical apocalypse. My personal favorite is this: A few days after 9-11, the FP team is sitting around brooding about the terrible situation. "This is awful." says Rummy, "We're at war, and we can't find the enemy. The worst part is, this war will be fought on American soil. We can never protect everything." And Bush (who did not get to be the most powerful man in the world by being an idiot) says, "Hey Dick, what's going on in Iraq?" And the Vice President says "Iraq? Why nothing. That son of a bitch Saddam is all bottled up, we're just waiting till he dies." And our President gets a gleam in his eye and says: "Why don't we hold the war in his piss ant country?"
We can speculate endlessly on why Bush made the terrible mistake of invading iraq. Maybe in a few years we'll get access to records of various meetings where it got discussed, things that are not available now. The bottom line is nobody knows why Bush did it, or if they have some sort of evidence they aren't allowed to say. And it was a terrible mistake that may keep hurting us for generations. actually Greg, were I you I'd have bolded the two previous sentences. I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. they speak more volumes than the subsequent ones. Posted by: Aziz at October 10, 2006 03:23 PM | Permalink to this commentIts difficult to understand the actions of a vanglorious, far less than rational leader who is the scion of a political dynasty and who appears bent on deliberately alienating and isolating his nation from the rest of the world. And its tough to understand Kim Jong II as well. Posted by: p.lukasiak at October 11, 2006 01:59 PM | Permalink to this comment |
Reviews of Belgravia Dispatch
"Awake"
--New York Times
Recent Entries
A Brief (and Belated) Word on Chas Freeman
What Would Real--Rather Than Rhetorical--Change in U.S. Foreign Policy Look Like? Of War, and Tent Hospitals The Obama Imperative Some Addt'l Thoughts Re: Georgia McCain: Let's Compound the Blunder! Georgia On My Mind Should We De-Emphasize The Terror Threat in U.S. Foreign Policy? (Very Belated) In-House News Straits of Hormuz
Search
English Language Media
New York Times
Financial Times The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation WSJ Opinion Matt Drudge Real Clear Politics
Foreign Affairs Commentariat
Non-English Language Press
The Blogs
Across the Aisle
Marc Ambinder America Abroad American Footprints The American Scene Armavirumque Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice &C (TNR) Phil Carter Chequer-Board Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Clive Davis Brad DeLong Democracy Arsensal Daniel Drezner Kevin Drum James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Hendrik Hertzberg Huffington Post Mickey Kaus Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Josh Marshall Eric Martin Obsidian Wings Oxblog Foreign Policy's Passport The Plank Post Global Gideon Rachman Romenesko Laura Rozen Andrew Sullivan James Taranto Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias
Law & Finance
Barron's
Bloomberg Bull and Bear Wise Calculated Risk CBS Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog Corp Law Blog DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Bruce MacEwen Gretchen Morgenson Floyd Norris Barry Ritholz Nouriel Roubini Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance
Think Tanks
Security
Books
The City
Curbed
Eater Gothamist NY Magazine NY Post NY Press New York Observer On The Inside Tribeca Trib Vanishing NY Village Voice
Archives
March 2009
January 2009 November 2008 August 2008 July 2008 May 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006
|
|||