The Belgravia Dispatch: V-I Day!

October 04, 2006

V-I Day!

Even as the Bush administration urges Americans to stay the course in Iraq, Republicans in Congress have put down a quiet marker in the apparent hope that V-I Day might be only months away.
Tucked away in fine print in the military spending bill for this past year was a lump sum of $20 million to pay for a celebration in the nation’s capital “for commemoration of success” in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Not surprisingly, the money was not spent.

Now Congressional Republicans are saying, in effect, maybe next year. A paragraph written into spending legislation and approved by the Senate and House allows the $20 million to be rolled over into 2007.

The original legislation empowered the president to designate “a day of celebration” to commemorate the success of the armed forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, and to “issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.”

Ladies and Gentlemen: Your tax dollars at work! Don't get me wrong. If we won, I'd be in favor of much more than 20MM being spent to flood Broadway, with the biggest parade since WWII, to congratulate our heroic troops. But it is just not happening. Not in '06, and not in '07. Certainly not with the current team in place, still refusing to make significant strategic re-adjustments, not least by keeping a dismally failed war leader in the E-Ring.

Posted by Gregory at October 4, 2006 01:57 PM

Comments

Well said. Republicans are looking to the 2008 election with this maneuver, and don't really care that Iraq burns.

Posted by: Dan at October 4, 2006 04:44 PM | Permalink to this comment

At least they could use the money to help support disabled or injured veterans, or veterans and their families who are suffering from economic hardship upon their return, instead of keeping it in the kitty for some imaginary victory bash.

Posted by: Tim at October 4, 2006 05:25 PM | Permalink to this comment

Don't worry, there is not going to be any victory parade for Iraq, Afghanistan, etec., any time soon. How could there by? If we have won how could the Bushies continue to justify all their warrantless monitoring of people's phones, e-mails etec., not to mention holding people indefinitely without trial at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere and have interrogators torture these prisoners?
Remember:
WAR IS PEACE!

Posted by: David All at October 4, 2006 05:54 PM | Permalink to this comment

Five or ten or fifteen years from now, expect guys who got mangled in Iraq to bear the brunt of "necessary" budget cuts forced by the recklessness of the current Congress.

Posted by: sglover at October 4, 2006 06:33 PM | Permalink to this comment

I was in Washington for the victory parade after the Gulf War in 1991. It was a nice spectacle, with lots of good visuals. It didn't have quite the political impact one might have thought, though.

Posted by: Zathras at October 5, 2006 05:12 AM | Permalink to this comment

So aren't you embarassed you voted for this group? I don't mean chagrined, irritated, or annoyed, but truly, deeply embarassed or what it says about you if you pulled the lever for these bastards.

Probably twice.

Posted by: Richard Bottoms at October 5, 2006 03:22 PM | Permalink to this comment

V-I day? The question should be who lost Iraq?

Posted by: Will J. at October 6, 2006 07:58 PM | Permalink to this comment

	« Ditch Denny, For Starters... \| Main \| Condi's Trip » October 04, 2006 V-I Day! NYT: Even as the Bush administration urges Americans to stay the course in Iraq, Republicans in Congress have put down a quiet marker in the apparent hope that V-I Day might be only months away. Tucked away in fine print in the military spending bill for this past year was a lump sum of $20 million to pay for a celebration in the nation’s capital “for commemoration of success” in Iraq and Afghanistan. Not surprisingly, the money was not spent. Now Congressional Republicans are saying, in effect, maybe next year. A paragraph written into spending legislation and approved by the Senate and House allows the $20 million to be rolled over into 2007. The original legislation empowered the president to designate “a day of celebration” to commemorate the success of the armed forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, and to “issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.” Ladies and Gentlemen: Your tax dollars at work! Don't get me wrong. If we won, I'd be in favor of much more than 20MM being spent to flood Broadway, with the biggest parade since WWII, to congratulate our heroic troops. But it is just not happening. Not in '06, and not in '07. Certainly not with the current team in place, still refusing to make significant strategic re-adjustments, not least by keeping a dismally failed war leader in the E-Ring. Posted by Gregory at October 4, 2006 01:57 PM Comments Well said. Republicans are looking to the 2008 election with this maneuver, and don't really care that Iraq burns. Posted by: Dan at October 4, 2006 04:44 PM \| Permalink to this comment At least they could use the money to help support disabled or injured veterans, or veterans and their families who are suffering from economic hardship upon their return, instead of keeping it in the kitty for some imaginary victory bash. Posted by: Tim at October 4, 2006 05:25 PM \| Permalink to this comment Don't worry, there is not going to be any victory parade for Iraq, Afghanistan, etec., any time soon. How could there by? If we have won how could the Bushies continue to justify all their warrantless monitoring of people's phones, e-mails etec., not to mention holding people indefinitely without trial at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere and have interrogators torture these prisoners? Remember: WAR IS PEACE! Posted by: David All at October 4, 2006 05:54 PM \| Permalink to this comment At least they could use the money to help support disabled or injured veterans, or veterans and their families who are suffering from economic hardship upon their return, instead of keeping it in the kitty for some imaginary victory bash. Five or ten or fifteen years from now, expect guys who got mangled in Iraq to bear the brunt of "necessary" budget cuts forced by the recklessness of the current Congress. Posted by: sglover at October 4, 2006 06:33 PM \| Permalink to this comment I was in Washington for the victory parade after the Gulf War in 1991. It was a nice spectacle, with lots of good visuals. It didn't have quite the political impact one might have thought, though. Posted by: Zathras at October 5, 2006 05:12 AM \| Permalink to this comment So aren't you embarassed you voted for this group? I don't mean chagrined, irritated, or annoyed, but truly, deeply embarassed or what it says about you if you pulled the lever for these bastards. Probably twice. Posted by: Richard Bottoms at October 5, 2006 03:22 PM \| Permalink to this comment V-I day? The question should be who lost Iraq? Posted by: Will J. at October 6, 2006 07:58 PM \| Permalink to this comment		Reviews of Belgravia Dispatch "Awake" --New York Times "Always-Worth Reading" --Andrew Sullivan Recent Entries A Brief (and Belated) Word on Chas Freeman What Would Real--Rather Than Rhetorical--Change in U.S. Foreign Policy Look Like? Of War, and Tent Hospitals The Obama Imperative Some Addt'l Thoughts Re: Georgia McCain: Let's Compound the Blunder! Georgia On My Mind Should We De-Emphasize The Terror Threat in U.S. Foreign Policy? (Very Belated) In-House News Straits of Hormuz Search Search this site: About the Author Email the Author English Language Media New York Times Financial Times The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation WSJ Opinion Matt Drudge Real Clear Politics Foreign Affairs Commentariat Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Le Monde Diplomatique National Interest Non-English Language Press Le Figaro Le Monde El Pais Pravda The Blogs Across the Aisle Marc Ambinder America Abroad American Footprints The American Scene Armavirumque Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice &C (TNR) Phil Carter Chequer-Board Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Clive Davis Brad DeLong Democracy Arsensal Daniel Drezner Kevin Drum James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Hendrik Hertzberg Huffington Post Mickey Kaus Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Josh Marshall Eric Martin Obsidian Wings Oxblog Foreign Policy's Passport The Plank Post Global Gideon Rachman Romenesko Laura Rozen Andrew Sullivan James Taranto Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias Law & Finance Barron's Bloomberg Bull and Bear Wise Calculated Risk CBS Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog Corp Law Blog DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Bruce MacEwen Gretchen Morgenson Floyd Norris Barry Ritholz Nouriel Roubini Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance Think Tanks AEI Baker Institute Brookings Carnegie Cato CFR CSIS Heritage IISS Intl Crisis Group USIP Security Janes Fed. American Scientists Defense Tech Global Security Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Books LRB NYRB NYT Book Review Paris Review TLS Granta Grand Street Arts & Letters Daily The City Curbed Eater Gothamist NY Magazine NY Post NY Press New York Observer On The Inside Tribeca Trib Vanishing NY Village Voice Archives March 2009 January 2009 November 2008 August 2008 July 2008 May 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 Syndicate this site: Belgravia Dispatch Maintained by: www.vikeny.com Powered by

	© 2007 Belgravia Dispatch