November 01, 2006Jonah Goldberg Gets Mail...Jonah, Man, I've read a lot of excrement in the blogosphere, but this item just might take the cake (though Glenn Reynolds' comparison of Iraq to South Philly gives a good run for the money). I mean, "(w)aterboarding isn't torture, its just part of the New England patrician experience"? How stupefyingly inane can these clowns get? Goldberg says he is posting this "without comment". Permit me to comment then Jonah: your correspondent is a total idiot, and it's risibly boorish and outrageously inane for you to even begin to take your pen-pal seriously, as evidently you do, having put this claptrap on your main page. But perhaps I'm surprised because I went to Andover, where quaint Grotonian mores of proctors waterboarding students never quite took off. Yes, Groton was always a tad too British, if you know what I mean, what with all the canings and such, so that perhaps your correspondent is on to something--it's important that we build character among our Boston Brahmin youth, after all, when not extracting actionable ticking time bomb intel from KSM, that is... (Hat Tip: Cunning). Posted by Gregory at November 1, 2006 05:51 AMComments
It goes very well with Tom Maguire's joke a few weeks ago in "Just One Minute" about waterboarding as a frat-house activity. (I suppose, though -- given the nature of Jonah's mother -- that he should receive some credit for not engaging in Black Masses.) Posted by: BruceMoomaw at November 1, 2006 08:51 AM | Permalink to this commentGreg, well said. Here's the problem with the issue of torture. Supporters of things like waterboarding claim that this technique is harmless, nothing worse than hazing rituals. Well....if that's the case, why would you think they would work on hardened warriors? How effective would they be on extracting information from people who do not wish to give it to you, if the techniques are as harmless as hazing rituals that Boy Scouts, as well as New England doctors go through? They play down the effects of torture, but play up their supposed benefit, i.e. they really have no idea what they are talking about. Posted by: Dan at November 1, 2006 11:21 AM | Permalink to this commentI also don't quite grasp the logic that if frat brothers/public school boys are doing it, obviously it must NOT be torture. Posted by: Antiquated Tory at November 1, 2006 12:25 PM | Permalink to this commentFor a guy who looks like Piggy, Jonah's awfully comfortable with a Lord of the Flies world. Posted by: SomeCallMeTim at November 1, 2006 12:40 PM | Permalink to this commentAsk them bluntly: why do you advocate North Vietnamese torture techniques? Do you advocate them because your rich college secretly practiced techniques similar to North Vietnamese torture? Did your rich college or your fraternity have a preponderance of sadists with unhealthy attraction for North Vietnamese torture techniques? Hmmm...hazing as another rite of passage alongside say, fake IDs for beer...'low-level' torture as all of a neat blend with it...and South Philly merging with Iraq. All this really speaks volumes about how wonderful these savants think American society is, and of what they apparently find tolerable (and what, by implicaton, they expect others to put up with) for the benefit of living in American-style democracy. Hearing them talk at both their most low-voiced and solemn, and at their most shreikingly outraged, you'd thought that being American meant never shrugging your shoulders at anything. I mean, get a load of the cataracts dumped forth in the run-up to the invasion on any one of a number of their blogs and such. But boy, was I ever wrong. It must be a reflection of how much disposable freedom and wealth they permit themselves, to throw around their moral and intellectual loose change on bile like this and keep straight faces securely glued to their smug, smarmy, squirrelly little faces. What this really demonstrates is how much sustainable violence, gee-whiz sadism and politicized equivalent of snuff have become so much (yawn) political porn. "Waterboarding?" Just another sideshow... Posted by: sekaijin at November 1, 2006 03:23 PM | Permalink to this commentHmmm...hazing as another rite of passage alongside say, fake IDs for beer...'low-level' torture as all of a neat blend with it...and South Philly merging with Iraq. All this really speaks volumes about how wonderful these savants think American society is, and of what they apparently find tolerable (and what, by implicaton, they expect others to put up with) for the benefit of living in American-style democracy. Hearing them talk at both their most low-voiced and solemn, and at their most shreikingly outraged, you'd thought that being American meant never shrugging your shoulders at anything. I mean, get a load of the cataracts dumped forth in the run-up to the invasion on any one of a number of their blogs and such. But boy, was I ever wrong. It must be a reflection of how much disposable freedom and wealth they permit themselves, to throw around their moral and intellectual loose change on bile like this and keep straight faces securely glued to their smug, smarmy, squirrelly little faces. What this really demonstrates is how much sustainable violence, gee-whiz sadism and politicized equivalent of snuff have become so much (yawn) political porn. "Waterboarding?" Just another sideshow... Posted by: sekaijin at November 1, 2006 03:23 PM | Permalink to this commentGreg, You know jolly well that Dubya went to Andover too. So let's put the responsibility for all this where it really belongs. Why didn't you teach him to take responsibility for his actions? And didn't you have a American history course? Your fellow alum doesn't seem to be aware the Constitution has a purpose greater that historical display. Glass houses and all that... Posted by: Adams at November 1, 2006 04:39 PM | Permalink to this commentI graduated from Groton in 1982 and I can assure everyone that while there was a certain amount of sadism among the students (as might be expected at a boarding school with long winters) anyone would even attempted waterboarding a fellow student would have been expelled. The Dean of Students, who was in charge of student discipline, was not known for his sense of humor when charges of student abuse were brought to his attention. I had a rougher time than some (being the smallest in my class and a smartass was a dangerous combination) and the Dean used to check in on me to ensure that the teasing / abuse stayed within limits. Posted by: Francis at November 1, 2006 07:57 PM | Permalink to this comment"...while there was a certain amount of sadism among the students (as might be expected at a boarding school with long winters).." ah the memories.... Posted by: greg djerejian at November 1, 2006 09:48 PM | Permalink to this commentGreg: "ah the memories" about boarding schools & long winters; or as George Orwell put it: Silly me, I thought the worse thing that happened at boarding school was when the students did themsevles up in blackface for school theater! Did not realize that these future leaders were being abused so that they could abuse others in turn when they had grown up & taken power! Posted by: David All at November 1, 2006 10:02 PM | Permalink to this commentAm I the only one who caught the sarcasm? Posted by: eCAHNomics at November 1, 2006 10:46 PM | Permalink to this commentIt is nice to hear that Groton and Andover were somewhat policed by the faculty at that time. I graduated from Deerfield in 1988 and similar things were still very much going on. The faculty, for the most part, could not have been less interested. It wasn't "a certain amount of sadism", it was a whole lot of seriously weird behavior. Seriously weird to the point that I brought it up when called for security clearances a few years later for some of these jokers. I don't know if things have changed with the girls and all of the rules that came with the girls, but it would not surprise me if the girls had adopted the same traditions and freshmen girls were now also getting brown swirlies. These traditions were so entrenched (and yes, it really did seem to me to be a New England thing) that they were seen as part of the whole prep school experience. Not being a Yankee, I saw it as, you know, assault. Something worth shooting someone over. But for the kids up there, it was just the way the world worked. I guess from that environment (and that was Bush's environment, not Midland or Houston), if thinking what you went through was "harmless fun" gets you through the night, you have a vested interest in not referring to similar things as "torture". Posted by: Todd at November 2, 2006 03:54 AM | Permalink to this commentUpon the conclusion of WWII, the United States prosecuted, convicted, and jailed (for terms exceeding 20 years) Japanese accused of waterboarding Americans during the war. The Japanese defense counsel's plea, "Don't you know we're in a war," was ignored by the American judges. Posted by: MD at November 2, 2006 01:42 PM | Permalink to this commentIn the 1970s, at my boarding school (Deerfield's arch rival) in northern Massachusetts, sadism was usually confined to Senior Week, in which packs of seniors roamed the school giving wedgies to any junior unlucky--or brazen--enough to be outside after study hall. There were rumors of "flushies" or "swirlies" (imagine those during the long-hair days), but I never witnessed or was subject to one. The main difference, of course was that hazing was usually a one-shot, and was subject to extreme consequences if overdone. Posted by: Tom S at November 2, 2006 03:31 PM | Permalink to this commentHI! I'am Spooler_Go_23. |
Reviews of Belgravia Dispatch
"Awake"
--New York Times
Recent Entries
A Brief (and Belated) Word on Chas Freeman
What Would Real--Rather Than Rhetorical--Change in U.S. Foreign Policy Look Like? Of War, and Tent Hospitals The Obama Imperative Some Addt'l Thoughts Re: Georgia McCain: Let's Compound the Blunder! Georgia On My Mind Should We De-Emphasize The Terror Threat in U.S. Foreign Policy? (Very Belated) In-House News Straits of Hormuz
Search
English Language Media
New York Times
Financial Times The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation WSJ Opinion Matt Drudge Real Clear Politics
Foreign Affairs Commentariat
Non-English Language Press
The Blogs
Across the Aisle
Marc Ambinder America Abroad American Footprints The American Scene Armavirumque Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice &C (TNR) Phil Carter Chequer-Board Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Clive Davis Brad DeLong Democracy Arsensal Daniel Drezner Kevin Drum James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Hendrik Hertzberg Huffington Post Mickey Kaus Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Josh Marshall Eric Martin Obsidian Wings Oxblog Foreign Policy's Passport The Plank Post Global Gideon Rachman Romenesko Laura Rozen Andrew Sullivan James Taranto Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias
Law & Finance
Barron's
Bloomberg Bull and Bear Wise Calculated Risk CBS Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog Corp Law Blog DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Bruce MacEwen Gretchen Morgenson Floyd Norris Barry Ritholz Nouriel Roubini Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance
Think Tanks
Security
Books
The City
Curbed
Eater Gothamist NY Magazine NY Post NY Press New York Observer On The Inside Tribeca Trib Vanishing NY Village Voice
Archives
March 2009
January 2009 November 2008 August 2008 July 2008 May 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006
|
|||