December 05, 2006BoltonHe's out. Any thoughts on who should replace him? (NB: Suggesting Rick Santorum is strictly forbidden!) Posted by Gregory at December 5, 2006 12:08 AMComments
I'll bite, how about Rick Santggggaaack! [We warned you. -ed] Posted by: Steve at December 5, 2006 12:42 AM | Permalink to this commentI think I heard George Mitchell's name floated. That would be great, but of course is quite impossible: the man's a Democrat, has successfully managed high-profile diplomatic missions (including the Good Friday accords), is a Democrat, enjoys the respect and trust of other countries and, above all, is a Democrat. So there's no way Bush will name him. Let's see. Who is hostile to the UN, belligerent to other diplomats, and agrees with Bush-Cheney's dingbat worldview? How about Virginia's former Senator, George Felix Allen? He's just like Bush, only racist, too (that'll go over really well at the UN), and would appreciate a high-profile gig if he's still thinking about running for President in 2008. Posted by: CaseyL at December 5, 2006 12:52 AM | Permalink to this commentDo you guys actually think Bush would actually nominate someone who might do some good there? Look who he picked for Secretary of Defense. Sorry, but I don't think Gates will do a good job, nor will whoever Bush will pick. Now, if I were president (and Republican) I would probably ask Colin Powell to represent me at the UN. While his reputation took a blow at that very location back in February 2003, he is still a very well respected man around the world, who will also look at protecting America first. Posted by: Dan at December 5, 2006 01:43 AM | Permalink to this commentWhy not Jesse Helms? He could use a nice sinecure, and then nobody needs to miss Bolton. Posted by: faux facsimile at December 5, 2006 03:09 AM | Permalink to this commentWell, in lieu of what's strictly forbidden, how about Sick Rantorum? And wouldn't that be a suitable name for a U.S. "diplomat" at this point? Posted by: dell at December 5, 2006 03:50 AM | Permalink to this commentHow about Karen Hughes? Seriously, the names I've read about are Paula Dobriansky and Zalmay Khalilzad. Precedent suggests the UN Ambassadorship could remain vacant for quite some time. However, the path to Bolton's renomination has been plainly blocked for long enough that even if President Bush did not accept it, Sec. Rice and the White House staff must have. So, unless they are set on Khalilzad and just want to wait until moving him out of Baghdad would not send an unfortunate signal, it may be that an announcement will be forthcoming soon. Posted by: Zathras at December 5, 2006 04:11 AM | Permalink to this commentZ has almost got it. The correct answer is Karl Rove. Posted by: CharleyCarp at December 5, 2006 05:07 AM | Permalink to this commentA ham sandwich would be an improvement. I'm guessing that the diplomatic corps must have dozens of Foreign Service Officers who are leagues more competent than Bolton ever was, and I expect that almost all of them have a sincere interest in working with the organization, instead of sabotaging it at every turn. It'd be kinda neat if the Beltway could tap a resource that it must know about. It's not like Jesse Helms is still there, representing the fucking moron constituency. Posted by: sglover at December 5, 2006 06:55 AM | Permalink to this commentA ham sandwich would be an improvement. I'm guessing that the diplomatic corps must have dozens of Foreign Service Officers who are leagues more competent than Bolton ever was, and I expect that almost all of them have a sincere interest in working with the organization, instead of sabotaging it at every turn. It'd be kinda neat if the Beltway could tap a resource that it must know about. It's not like Jesse Helms is still there, representing the fucking moron constituency. Posted by: sglover at December 5, 2006 06:59 AM | Permalink to this commentIn a perfect world, Mark Danforth would be asked back to signal that the Bush regime realizes how moronic it has been for the past six years.... I think I heard George Mitchell's name floated. I can see Bush nominating a Dem, but one of the compliant types (think Lee Hamilton) rather than a competent one like Mitchell. Another name that comes to mind is Michael Steele -- for all the obvious reasons. But personally, I think Bush should nominate Katherine Harris --- just for the giggle/jiggle factor alone. Posted by: p.lukasiak at December 5, 2006 07:17 AM | Permalink to this commentsglover: Can you nominate a ham sandwich? I don't see how it could get through committee without being nibbled at (or completely eaten, considering that Chris Dodd, who looks like he's got a good appetite, is a member). Seriously though, I think Bush would be wise to nominate somebody like Dennis Prager. That'll teach those Koran worshiping devils. Posted by: Quiddity at December 5, 2006 08:20 AM | Permalink to this commentThe correct answer is Karl Rove. I think Rove is marginally more likely to be sent to Gitmo than to the UN. Posted by: Anderson at December 5, 2006 02:11 PM | Permalink to this commentPipe dream candidate, Bill Clinton. Is there any American political figure more respected and liked around the world. Plausible yet not gonna happen Colin Powell Probably gonna happen Otto Reich. Posted by: jon at December 5, 2006 03:32 PM | Permalink to this commentI vote for the ham sandwich. But if you insist on a sentient being as our man in the UN, how about Jimmy Carter? Vernon Jordan? Geraldine Ferraro? Just spitballing, really. Posted by: LL at December 5, 2006 04:45 PM | Permalink to this commentNo, no, no. You've got to think - who's the least successful neocon or Iran-Contra era Republican out there. I'm thinking Eliot Abrams. Outside possibility of Donald Rumsfeld. The Bush Administration clearly wants someone who views the U.N. as something to be imploded. They don't want someone who will have a successful stay in Turtle Bay. Posted by: James F. Elliott at December 5, 2006 05:14 PM | Permalink to this commentBring back Jeanne Kirkpatrick! Posted by: Bret Eagan at December 5, 2006 06:06 PM | Permalink to this commentactually it looks like jim leach might be the lead horse...nor should we discount zalmay khalilzad, of course. Posted by: greg djerejian at December 5, 2006 06:20 PM | Permalink to this commentgreg: I don't believe this administration would appoint an early public opponent of the Iraq war, no matter how distinguished he is. Which leaves us a thin, undistinguished bench. I doubt it's Leach. Maybe Khalilzad, as I don't think he is the indespensible man in Iraq. (The Shia don't especially like him.) Well, since my first choice is out, how about Crazy Curt Weldon? More seriously, I think James Elliot above is partly right. There's a part of the voices around the administration that still fear the black helicopters of the NWO, but at the same time haven't Bush's recent speeches suggested that if there was a way of dumping the whole Iraq mess off on the UN, he'd happily do it? (I guess I imagine him recalling how he got out of all the messes he made as a businessman.) Posted by: JakeB at December 5, 2006 08:05 PM | Permalink to this commentMy money's on Jeb. A) He's available, and is surely looking for more experience in the foreign policy sphere. Let's face it -- He's been practicing his insults on Castro secretly hoping one day he'll get to face the rest of the world. If he isn't ready now, he'll never be. B) He's an insider. This is required. He'll toe any line, anytime, and only deliver the good news. Jeb grew up playing this game. C) Mom and Dad are pulling for him, and so are Jenna and Barbara (The girls walk all over Bush 43, so they're now a very important constituency to suck up to in the family). D) He's a member of PNAC. See A). E) He's popular with hispanic voters, who will get a public reminder that Republicans represent them better than progressive Democrats. F) Unlike Bolton, it's a safe bet he'll be confirmed. I know he's a dark horse. In Bushs' world representing the country on the international stage is a step down from Governor. Not to mention he can still claim today that he wasn't a part of his brother's administration, or its egregious mistakes. But the advantages -- it's only a two year gig, comes with all sorts of perks and parties, has a Very Serious Title and Job, and of course, keeps Jeb on the front page. Who's with me? Posted by: Redwretch at December 5, 2006 08:49 PM | Permalink to this commentI'm thinking Mr. Noltob, who only coincidentally looks like John Bolton without a mustache. Posted by: Dustbin Of History at December 6, 2006 12:15 AM | Permalink to this comment |
Reviews of Belgravia Dispatch
"Awake"
--New York Times
Recent Entries
McCain: Let's Compound the Blunder!
Georgia On My Mind Should We De-Emphasize The Terror Threat in U.S. Foreign Policy? (Very Belated) In-House News Straits of Hormuz Quotable More Predictions Predictions, Predictions! A 'Sick Man of Europe' Reprise? Addingtonism (Belatedly) Ripe For A Comeuppance?
Search
English Language Media
New York Times
Financial Times The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation WSJ Opinion Matt Drudge Real Clear Politics
Foreign Affairs Commentariat
Non-English Language Press
The Blogs
Across the Aisle
Marc Ambinder America Abroad American Footprints The American Scene Armavirumque Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice &C (TNR) Phil Carter Chequer-Board Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Clive Davis Brad DeLong Democracy Arsensal Ross Douthat Daniel Drezner Kevin Drum James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Hendrik Hertzberg Huffington Post Innocents Abroad Mickey Kaus Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Josh Marshall Eric Martin Obsidian Wings Oxblog Foreign Policy's Passport The Plank Post Global Gideon Rachman Red State Romenesko Laura Rozen Andrew Sullivan James Taranto Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias
Law & Finance
Barron's
Bloomberg Bruce MacEwen Bull and Bear Wise CBS Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog Corp Law Blog D.C. Toedt DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Gretchen Morgenson Floyd Norris Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance
Think Tanks
Security
Books
The City
Curbed
Gawker Lockhart Steele NY Magazine Nick Denton NY Post NY Press New York Observer On The Inside Tribeca Trib Walk Through Village Voice
Archives
August 2008
July 2008 May 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
|||