December 07, 2006

ISG Excerpts (IV)

RECOMMENDATION 46: The new Secretary of Defense should make every effort to build healthy civil-military relations, by creating an environment in which the senior military feel free to offer independent advice not only to the civilian leadership in the Pentagon but also to the President and the National Security Council, as envisioned in the Goldwater-Nichols legislation.

Why, I wonder what this could be about?

See also:

U.S. military forces, especially our ground forces, have been stretched nearly to the breaking point by the repeated deployments in Iraq, with attendant casualties (almost 3,000 dead and more than 21,000 wounded), greater difficulty in recruiting, and accelerated wear on equipment.

Additionally, the defense budget as a whole is in danger of disarray, as supplemental funding winds down and reset costs become clear. It will be a major challenge to meet ongoing requirements for other current and future security threats that need to be accommodated together with spending for operations and maintenance, reset, personnel, and benefits for active duty and retired personnel. Restoring the capability of our military forces should be a high priority for the United States at this time.

The U.S. military has a long tradition of strong partnership between the civilian leadership of the Department of Defense and the uniformed services. Both have long benefited from a relationship in which the civilian leadership exercises control with the advantage of fully candid professional advice, and the military serves loyally with the understanding that its advice has been heard and valued. That tradition has frayed, and civil-military relations need to be repaired.

Thank God Rumsfeld is out.

pp. 76-77

Posted by Gregory at December 7, 2006 04:07 AM
Comments

I think saying we need "an environment in which the senior military feel free to offer independent advice" is a critique of Rumsfeld's management style.

But it's just a guess.

Posted by: Quiddity at December 7, 2006 06:04 AM | Permalink to this comment Permalink

Isn't it also a critique of Bush's style? I mean how often could Bush actually receive independent advice? Did you see how he reacted yesterday to having to hold a copy of a report he really did not want to see? It pained him to have to hold the report and comment on it. "Interesting recommendations," he said. What kind of president says a bipartisan commission's full report is interesting? One that is forced to read what he does not want to.

Posted by: Dan at December 7, 2006 11:16 AM | Permalink to this comment Permalink

Dan: Does anyone know whether or not Bush Jr. Actually Reads anything?

Posted by: David All at December 7, 2006 10:09 PM | Permalink to this comment Permalink

About Belgravia Dispatch

Gregory Djerejian, an international lawyer and business executive, comments intermittently on global politics, finance & diplomacy at this site. The views expressed herein are solely his own and do not represent those of any organization.


More About the Author
Email the Author
Recent Entries
Search



The News
The Blogs
Foreign Affairs Commentariat
Law & Finance
Think Tanks
Security
Books
The City
Epicurean Corner
Archives
Syndicate this site:
XML RSS

Belgravia Dispatch Maintained by:
www.vikeny.com

Powered by