The Belgravia Dispatch: The Freshman

January 01, 2007

The Freshman

Deborah Solomon interviewed James Webb last Saturday over at the NYT Magazine. A couple excerpts, in case you missed:

Q: You previously belonged to the Republican Party and held two big positions — assistant secretary of defense and, later, secretary of the Navy — under President Reagan.
A: I am very proud to have served in the Reagan administration. He had the ability to inspire people in this country in terms of how they viewed themselves as Americans.

Q: Why did you decide to switch and become a Democrat?

A: A lot of people have left the Republican Party because they went over there like me on national-security issues and were never comfortable on other issues — social issues or issues of economic fairness — and now are beginning to see that the Democrats can have a stronger position on foreign policy.

And:

Q: As a decorated veteran of the Vietnam War, do you have a timetable in mind for getting us out of Iraq?
A: I have a totally different view of timetables than most people. What we need before we start withdrawing large numbers of troops is some sort of a diplomatic environment in which we can decide how to withdraw our troops.

Q: Right, most Americans seem to agree that we need to involve other countries.

A: What has been missing for the last couple of years is the aggressive diplomatic approach that would then allow you to withdraw your troops. We have been doing this backward by putting the cart before the horse. [emphasis added]

Keep a close eye on Webb. I suspect he's going to be one of the very best pols we've got in the Senate--at least if you prefer independent thinkers to the goose-stepping herds that too often pass as legislators.

P.S. It's good to see some Senators like Dodd and Specter (who like Webb understand the critical importance of a region-wide diplomatic approach) ditching the Crawford variant of the Führerprinzip and traveling to places like Damascus to (unthinkable!) actually dialogue with leaders with whom relations are strained. Sacrilege for bovine true-believers, I know, but increasingly critical as the regional situation continues to dangerously deteriorate.

Posted by Gregory at January 1, 2007 12:48 AM

Comments

Glad to see you back and quite prolific.
Happy New Year to Reasoned Voices.

Posted by: Dr. Know at January 1, 2007 03:33 AM | Permalink to this comment

What is missing is any diplomatic effort. We have none. Not at the UN, not in the middle east. No where in the world do we have any credible diplomatic efforts.
Six years with zero effort.

The idea of bringing change by force hasn't worked in the past 50 years and will not work now. The "sanctions" put in place to achieve changed hasn't worked in Cuba or any other place in the world. Only by open dialogue and exchanges, including trading, will change begin to happen. KitCarson

Posted by: KitCarson at January 1, 2007 10:14 PM | Permalink to this comment

While not being by any means whatsoever a member of the political Right here in America, much less a member of the Republican party, one is not entirely enthusiastic about Mr. Djerejian postive view of Senator-Elect Webb. Actually, having read the interview in the New York Times Sunday Magazine when it first came out, I was not very surprised at the contents of the interview. First, one must remember that the interviewer, Miss Deborah Solomon, is herself quite liberal (in the American sense) and, hence the entire interview was something in the nature of a
'soft-ball' exercise. She singularly failed to ask any difficult or hard
questions of Secretary Webb. So, for instance she failed to note that Webb has changed various of his positions recently for reasons which are not entirely transparent, except that he could not be (in one instance) against admitting Women to Annapolis pour example, and run on the Democratic Party line.

As per Webb's comments on the current situation in Iraq, I found them entire jejune, and rien plus, as it were...Id est, nothing but, the usual Washington Pays Legal, chattering classes chit chat. Who but his dead uncle has not talked of the need for a 'diplomatic effort' in Iraq, in the last two or three months now. If not longer in fact, even prior to the ISG report. And, by the bye: what in the name of heaven is a 'aggressive diplomatic approach'? As opposed to an 'unaggressive diplomatic approach'? It is only the mere fact, that Messers. Webb, Biden et. al., do not have to implement any of their proposed solutions, that enables them to continue floating them. Not matter how unrealistic they are. Which, nota bene: is not to gainsay the positive value of diplomatic pourparlers, it is just a reminder that per se, such efforts, will avail the USA nothing, absolutley nothing in Iraq. As informed commentators have noted (see especially Nir Rose articles in particular) no outside power, has any great, determining influence in what is going on in Iraq currently. Unfortunately much of the mayhem currently going on in the country is purely Iraqi-based sectarian bloodshed, Shiite versus Sunni. Or more recently especially in Basra, Shiite versus Shiite warfare. In no case whatseover, does talking with anyone resolve these issues. Something that Senator-Elect Webb appears to be cheerfully ignorant of...

Posted by: Charles Coutinho, PH. D. at January 2, 2007 06:47 AM | Permalink to this comment

As informed commentators have noted (see especially Nir Rose articles in particular) no outside power, has any great, determining influence in what is going on in Iraq currently.

This is obviously correct.

So why are we spending $12 billion a *month*, plus a dozen or so soldiers dead and a much larger number wounded, trying to control all that?

Out now.

Posted by: J Thomas at January 2, 2007 05:07 PM | Permalink to this comment

Charles,
Do you really think Sen. Webb(isn't swearing in today?) is ignorant of something that could get his son killed? You do know that Sen. Webb's son is over in Iraq right now, don't you?

Posted by: Ghost of Tom Joad at January 2, 2007 05:40 PM | Permalink to this comment

CC,
What a load of puffed up bombast. Newt would be proud.

Posted by: Dr. Know at January 3, 2007 10:13 AM | Permalink to this comment

"I was not very surprised at the contents of the interview. First, one must remember that the interviewer, Miss Deborah Solomon, is herself quite liberal (in the American sense) and, hence the entire interview was something in the nature of a
'soft-ball' exercise. She singularly failed to ask any difficult or hard
questions of Secretary Webb"

The press should only ask tough questions of critics of the administration. Three years of "we are winning" before any tough questions were asked of the administration says it all.

Posted by: centrist at January 3, 2007 03:45 PM | Permalink to this comment

	« Cordesman, Heisbourg, Etc. \| Main \| "Surge" Query » January 01, 2007 The Freshman Deborah Solomon interviewed James Webb last Saturday over at the NYT Magazine. A couple excerpts, in case you missed: Q: You previously belonged to the Republican Party and held two big positions — assistant secretary of defense and, later, secretary of the Navy — under President Reagan. A: I am very proud to have served in the Reagan administration. He had the ability to inspire people in this country in terms of how they viewed themselves as Americans. Q: Why did you decide to switch and become a Democrat? A: A lot of people have left the Republican Party because they went over there like me on national-security issues and were never comfortable on other issues — social issues or issues of economic fairness — and now are beginning to see that the Democrats can have a stronger position on foreign policy. And: Q: As a decorated veteran of the Vietnam War, do you have a timetable in mind for getting us out of Iraq? A: I have a totally different view of timetables than most people. What we need before we start withdrawing large numbers of troops is some sort of a diplomatic environment in which we can decide how to withdraw our troops. Q: Right, most Americans seem to agree that we need to involve other countries. A: What has been missing for the last couple of years is the aggressive diplomatic approach that would then allow you to withdraw your troops. We have been doing this backward by putting the cart before the horse. [emphasis added] Keep a close eye on Webb. I suspect he's going to be one of the very best pols we've got in the Senate--at least if you prefer independent thinkers to the goose-stepping herds that too often pass as legislators. P.S. It's good to see some Senators like Dodd and Specter (who like Webb understand the critical importance of a region-wide diplomatic approach) ditching the Crawford variant of the Führerprinzip and traveling to places like Damascus to (unthinkable!) actually dialogue with leaders with whom relations are strained. Sacrilege for bovine true-believers, I know, but increasingly critical as the regional situation continues to dangerously deteriorate. Posted by Gregory at January 1, 2007 12:48 AM Comments Glad to see you back and quite prolific. Happy New Year to Reasoned Voices. Posted by: Dr. Know at January 1, 2007 03:33 AM \| Permalink to this comment What is missing is any diplomatic effort. We have none. Not at the UN, not in the middle east. No where in the world do we have any credible diplomatic efforts. Six years with zero effort. The idea of bringing change by force hasn't worked in the past 50 years and will not work now. The "sanctions" put in place to achieve changed hasn't worked in Cuba or any other place in the world. Only by open dialogue and exchanges, including trading, will change begin to happen. KitCarson Posted by: KitCarson at January 1, 2007 10:14 PM \| Permalink to this comment While not being by any means whatsoever a member of the political Right here in America, much less a member of the Republican party, one is not entirely enthusiastic about Mr. Djerejian postive view of Senator-Elect Webb. Actually, having read the interview in the New York Times Sunday Magazine when it first came out, I was not very surprised at the contents of the interview. First, one must remember that the interviewer, Miss Deborah Solomon, is herself quite liberal (in the American sense) and, hence the entire interview was something in the nature of a 'soft-ball' exercise. She singularly failed to ask any difficult or hard questions of Secretary Webb. So, for instance she failed to note that Webb has changed various of his positions recently for reasons which are not entirely transparent, except that he could not be (in one instance) against admitting Women to Annapolis pour example, and run on the Democratic Party line. As per Webb's comments on the current situation in Iraq, I found them entire jejune, and rien plus, as it were...Id est, nothing but, the usual Washington Pays Legal, chattering classes chit chat. Who but his dead uncle has not talked of the need for a 'diplomatic effort' in Iraq, in the last two or three months now. If not longer in fact, even prior to the ISG report. And, by the bye: what in the name of heaven is a 'aggressive diplomatic approach'? As opposed to an 'unaggressive diplomatic approach'? It is only the mere fact, that Messers. Webb, Biden et. al., do not have to implement any of their proposed solutions, that enables them to continue floating them. Not matter how unrealistic they are. Which, nota bene: is not to gainsay the positive value of diplomatic pourparlers, it is just a reminder that per se, such efforts, will avail the USA nothing, absolutley nothing in Iraq. As informed commentators have noted (see especially Nir Rose articles in particular) no outside power, has any great, determining influence in what is going on in Iraq currently. Unfortunately much of the mayhem currently going on in the country is purely Iraqi-based sectarian bloodshed, Shiite versus Sunni. Or more recently especially in Basra, Shiite versus Shiite warfare. In no case whatseover, does talking with anyone resolve these issues. Something that Senator-Elect Webb appears to be cheerfully ignorant of... Posted by: Charles Coutinho, PH. D. at January 2, 2007 06:47 AM \| Permalink to this comment As informed commentators have noted (see especially Nir Rose articles in particular) no outside power, has any great, determining influence in what is going on in Iraq currently. This is obviously correct. So why are we spending $12 billion a month, plus a dozen or so soldiers dead and a much larger number wounded, trying to control all that? Out now. Posted by: J Thomas at January 2, 2007 05:07 PM \| Permalink to this comment Charles, Do you really think Sen. Webb(isn't swearing in today?) is ignorant of something that could get his son killed? You do know that Sen. Webb's son is over in Iraq right now, don't you? Posted by: Ghost of Tom Joad at January 2, 2007 05:40 PM \| Permalink to this comment CC, What a load of puffed up bombast. Newt would be proud. Posted by: Dr. Know at January 3, 2007 10:13 AM \| Permalink to this comment "I was not very surprised at the contents of the interview. First, one must remember that the interviewer, Miss Deborah Solomon, is herself quite liberal (in the American sense) and, hence the entire interview was something in the nature of a 'soft-ball' exercise. She singularly failed to ask any difficult or hard questions of Secretary Webb" The press should only ask tough questions of critics of the administration. Three years of "we are winning" before any tough questions were asked of the administration says it all. Posted by: centrist at January 3, 2007 03:45 PM \| Permalink to this comment		Reviews of Belgravia Dispatch "Awake" --New York Times "Always-Worth Reading" --Andrew Sullivan Recent Entries A Brief (and Belated) Word on Chas Freeman What Would Real--Rather Than Rhetorical--Change in U.S. Foreign Policy Look Like? Of War, and Tent Hospitals The Obama Imperative Some Addt'l Thoughts Re: Georgia McCain: Let's Compound the Blunder! Georgia On My Mind Should We De-Emphasize The Terror Threat in U.S. Foreign Policy? (Very Belated) In-House News Straits of Hormuz Search Search this site: About the Author Email the Author English Language Media New York Times Financial Times The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation WSJ Opinion Matt Drudge Real Clear Politics Foreign Affairs Commentariat Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Le Monde Diplomatique National Interest Non-English Language Press Le Figaro Le Monde El Pais Pravda The Blogs Across the Aisle Marc Ambinder America Abroad American Footprints The American Scene Armavirumque Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice &C (TNR) Phil Carter Chequer-Board Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Clive Davis Brad DeLong Democracy Arsensal Daniel Drezner Kevin Drum James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Hendrik Hertzberg Huffington Post Mickey Kaus Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Josh Marshall Eric Martin Obsidian Wings Oxblog Foreign Policy's Passport The Plank Post Global Gideon Rachman Romenesko Laura Rozen Andrew Sullivan James Taranto Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias Law & Finance Barron's Bloomberg Bull and Bear Wise Calculated Risk CBS Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog Corp Law Blog DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Bruce MacEwen Gretchen Morgenson Floyd Norris Barry Ritholz Nouriel Roubini Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance Think Tanks AEI Baker Institute Brookings Carnegie Cato CFR CSIS Heritage IISS Intl Crisis Group USIP Security Janes Fed. American Scientists Defense Tech Global Security Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Books LRB NYRB NYT Book Review Paris Review TLS Granta Grand Street Arts & Letters Daily The City Curbed Eater Gothamist NY Magazine NY Post NY Press New York Observer On The Inside Tribeca Trib Vanishing NY Village Voice Archives March 2009 January 2009 November 2008 August 2008 July 2008 May 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 Syndicate this site: Belgravia Dispatch Maintained by: www.vikeny.com Powered by

	© 2007 Belgravia Dispatch