July 21, 2007QueryIn an otherwise relatively routine op-ed calling for the U.N. to ratchet up its involvement in Iraq (wise), Zal Khalilzad writes: "(s)everal of Iraq’s neighbors — not only Syria and Iran but also some friends of the United States — are pursuing destabilizing policies." "Several" and "friends" plural connotes more than one, so ostensibly he's not just speaking of Turkish saber-rattling in the north. Surely the Kuwaitis or Jordanians aren't causing any trouble? Is there a message for the Saudis here, or? Comments
It's surely a message to both Turks and Saudis. The question is whether it's a message from the Bush administration, or just from Amb. Khalilzad. Previous American administrations have often communicated messages to Riyadh privately or, in public, cryptically. This saves face for Saudi leaders, allowing them room to adjust their country's foreign policy to accomodate American interests without appearing to yield to American pressure. However, it also requires that the United States keep a close eye on what the Saudis are actually doing -- and it makes essential Saudi understanding of who speaks authoritatively for the American government. We've been in bad shape as far as communications with the Saudis go for a while. Preoccupied with conveying a message to its domestic audience (about Arab "moderates" battling Arab "extremists"), the Bush administration has chosen not to emphasize the support given by Saudi nationals to the Sunni Arab insurgency in Iraq. It has also sent confusing signals as far as who speaks for the President -- now the Secretary of State, now the Vice President, again, perhaps, the UN Ambassador. The problem has been compounded from time to time recently by infighting within the Saudi government as to who makes policy there. Personally, I think it might be a good idea for American initiatives in the region to be communicated to Riyadh through Khalilzad, irregular though the channel would be. Khalilzad is abler than Secretary of State Rice and has sounder instincts than Vice President Cheney. But is this what is actually happening? I don't have any idea. For all I know Khalilzad may just be sending up a trial balloon in the hope that if no one in Washington shoots it down the governments in the region may start to look to him as Washington's point man for Middle Eastern diplomacy. Of course, his advocacy of greater UN involvement in Iraq-related problems would be consistent with this also. It might even be the case that this is more than Khalilzad's personal trial balloon -- the administration's feuding factions may have gotten together and decided to pursue policy in the region using his office as its focal point. That's not something I'd bet money on, given what we've seen to date, but I suppose it's possible. Posted by: Zathras at July 21, 2007 03:47 AM | Permalink to this comment |
Reviews of Belgravia Dispatch
"Awake"
--New York Times
Recent Entries
A Brief (and Belated) Word on Chas Freeman
What Would Real--Rather Than Rhetorical--Change in U.S. Foreign Policy Look Like? Of War, and Tent Hospitals The Obama Imperative Some Addt'l Thoughts Re: Georgia McCain: Let's Compound the Blunder! Georgia On My Mind Should We De-Emphasize The Terror Threat in U.S. Foreign Policy? (Very Belated) In-House News Straits of Hormuz
Search
English Language Media
New York Times
Financial Times The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation WSJ Opinion Matt Drudge Real Clear Politics
Foreign Affairs Commentariat
Non-English Language Press
The Blogs
Across the Aisle
Marc Ambinder America Abroad American Footprints The American Scene Armavirumque Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice &C (TNR) Phil Carter Chequer-Board Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Clive Davis Brad DeLong Democracy Arsensal Daniel Drezner Kevin Drum James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Hendrik Hertzberg Huffington Post Mickey Kaus Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Josh Marshall Eric Martin Obsidian Wings Oxblog Foreign Policy's Passport The Plank Post Global Gideon Rachman Romenesko Laura Rozen Andrew Sullivan James Taranto Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias
Law & Finance
Barron's
Bloomberg Bull and Bear Wise Calculated Risk CBS Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog Corp Law Blog DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Bruce MacEwen Gretchen Morgenson Floyd Norris Barry Ritholz Nouriel Roubini Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance
Think Tanks
Security
Books
The City
Curbed
Eater Gothamist NY Magazine NY Post NY Press New York Observer On The Inside Tribeca Trib Vanishing NY Village Voice
Archives
March 2009
January 2009 November 2008 August 2008 July 2008 May 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006
|
|||