October 06, 2007The Flag Pin FolliesBack from a business trip this weekend I see that Fox News and other outlets are in a tizzy about Barack Obama's flag pin statement. What infantile inanity, even by today's wretched standards. Look, I remember walking down 5th Avenue in the low 50s on 9/14/01 (or thereabouts, I seem to recall it was the Friday after the attack). A guy was selling the flag-pins, and spontaneously I pulled a couple bucks out of my pocket and made the impulse buy, immediately putting it on the lapel of my suit. The hazy dust and stench of death still enveloped my downtown neighborhood, and it felt like the right thing to do. But, you know, by November of that same year, pre-Thanksgiving even (I know, shocking!), many of us moved on and took the pins off. This is because real patriotism isn't wearing a flag-pin on your lapel, it's defending the basic values of our constitutional democracy against our foes, whether foreign ones or self-inflicted wounds. Re: the latter, the myriad hustlers in our midst bowing down with servile complaisance to the neo-monarchist banana republicanism of the Bush 43 era have done us untold harm these past years, with many of these very same blow-dried mediocrities sporting their merry pins like pitiably self-contented buffoons. Enough of this nonsense, please (this includes Hillary Clinton's nauseatingly didactic tutorial on the many ways we happy villagers can showcase our patriotic verve...) Posted by Gregory at October 6, 2007 11:56 AMComments
Damned if Survey USA hasn’t already done a poll of Ohioans (who usually pretty closely reflect overall American opinion) on this burning issue ( http://www.surveyusa.com/breaking.aspx , Poll #12738). Short version: 22% of them think that not wearing a flag pin makes you less patriotic. In short, we have reassuring confirmation that only 22% of the American people have lost their minds. Which makes it an even more staggering commentary on the nature of modern American political reporting that our reporters have decided to try and turn this into a major controversy. Obama has obviously decided to try basing his campaign on the assumption that American voters are grownups. This may not be wise; an awful lot of past candidates have come to grief on that assumption -- but it’s always an interesting experiment. Meanwhile, Ron Paul is now defending him: http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/10/_ron_paul_says_obama_shouldnt_be_condemned_over_flagpin_flap.php . Since it's a safe bet that almost all of those 22% who think that pin non-wearers are unpatriotic are among the 32% or so of the electorate that still call themselves Republicans -- so that their support is still critical to actually winning the GOP nomination -- I can hardly wait to see the comments on this issue at the next GOP candidates' debate. Posted by: Bruce Moomaw at October 6, 2007 05:07 PM | Permalink to this commentGreg, Take their pins from them? There are a great many people in this nation, who, if they could, would want to tail gate parties and watch the war. This is there 'bet'...this is their way into the fight....be on the team. This IS their contribution! Posted by: jonst at October 6, 2007 06:21 PM | Permalink to this commentToo good to be passed up: http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8811 . I just don't do jewelry. Women do jewelry, and I understand that. Well, I don't really understand it; I get that women need to impress other women, and there is tradition to consider, but jewelry still seems a lot of trouble and expense to go to. Plus, there is some jewelry that can only be worn if metal first pierces human flesh. I don't even like to think about this. Suit pins are sort of borderline jewelry. They're usually cheap, removing what is probably -- deep in my innermost heart -- my biggest objection to ornamentation of this kind. But I only wear a suit some of the time, usually for important business meetings and social events involving some preparation. Pins are just one more thing to remember, and if I misplace some pin I don't want to have to spend hours searching my residence for fear of being seen to make some kind of political statement if I can't find the thing. If I'm not wearing a suit, the only way to apply a pin is by sticking it through my shirt. One can only do this so many times before having to discard the shirt, which seems a waste especially (another confession here) to one who regards shopping for clothes as one of life's less pleasurable activities. There is finally the fact that no one can talk to me for more than about ten seconds without pegging me as an American. The great majority of people with whom I interact professionally and otherwise are also Americans. And only the seriously obtuse can enter in to a discussion of world affairs with me and not notice that I am by habit and conviction the Yankee-est of Yankees. All these things combine to make wearing an American flag pin somewhat superfluous. But I cannot speak for Sen. Obama. Speaking hypothetically, if he did not share my objections to wearing jewelry and had any reason to think that his somewhat exotic name might lead to some people mistaking him for a foreigner -- a significant disadvantage for a Presidential candidate -- he has done very well in his fundraising, making him able to hire people to keep him in flag pins. And he wears a suit more often than not. So for all I know Obama does in fact have a political agenda signified by his going pinless. Posted by: Zathras at October 7, 2007 03:17 PM | Permalink to this comment |
Reviews of Belgravia Dispatch
"Awake"
--New York Times
Recent Entries
A Brief (and Belated) Word on Chas Freeman
What Would Real--Rather Than Rhetorical--Change in U.S. Foreign Policy Look Like? Of War, and Tent Hospitals The Obama Imperative Some Addt'l Thoughts Re: Georgia McCain: Let's Compound the Blunder! Georgia On My Mind Should We De-Emphasize The Terror Threat in U.S. Foreign Policy? (Very Belated) In-House News Straits of Hormuz
Search
English Language Media
New York Times
Financial Times The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation WSJ Opinion Matt Drudge Real Clear Politics
Foreign Affairs Commentariat
Non-English Language Press
The Blogs
Across the Aisle
Marc Ambinder America Abroad American Footprints The American Scene Armavirumque Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice &C (TNR) Phil Carter Chequer-Board Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Clive Davis Brad DeLong Democracy Arsensal Daniel Drezner Kevin Drum James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Hendrik Hertzberg Huffington Post Mickey Kaus Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Josh Marshall Eric Martin Obsidian Wings Oxblog Foreign Policy's Passport The Plank Post Global Gideon Rachman Romenesko Laura Rozen Andrew Sullivan James Taranto Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias
Law & Finance
Barron's
Bloomberg Bull and Bear Wise Calculated Risk CBS Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog Corp Law Blog DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Bruce MacEwen Gretchen Morgenson Floyd Norris Barry Ritholz Nouriel Roubini Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance
Think Tanks
Security
Books
The City
Curbed
Eater Gothamist NY Magazine NY Post NY Press New York Observer On The Inside Tribeca Trib Vanishing NY Village Voice
Archives
March 2009
January 2009 November 2008 August 2008 July 2008 May 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006
|
|||