The Belgravia Dispatch: Quotable

January 10, 2008

Quotable

Musharraf, to the Straits Times: "I challenge anybody coming into our mountains. They would regret that day".

Excerpts:

MR PERVEZ Musharraf, Pakistan's embattled president, warned that any unilateral intervention in his country by coalition forces fighting in Afghanistan would be treated as an invasion.
Unless agreed to by Pakistan, any entry by the United States or coalition forces into Pakistan's tribal areas would be resisted as a breach of Pakistan's sovereignty, Mr Musharraf told The Straits Times in his first interview with a newspaper since the assassination of Ms Benazir Bhutto on Dec 27.

Four American politicians, all Democrats contending for the party's nomination for the race to the White House, have called for US forces now in neighbouring Afghanistan to join the Pakistan Army's counter-insurgency campaign and to hunt down Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan's tribal areas.

President Musharraf slammed the 'perception in the United States (that) what our army cannot do, they can do'.

Added the president: 'I challenge anybody coming into our mountains. They would regret that day.'

Mr Musharraf also took issue with US Senator Hillary Clinton's proposal, made on the eve of her New Hampshire primary victory, to place Pakistan's nuclear weapons under supervision by the US and the UK. Her statement, the president said, was 'an intrusion into our privacy, into our sensitivity... She doesn't seem to understand how well-guarded these assets are'.

And I can't help wondering what Pervez would make of op-eds like this one, so energetically penned by notables among our estimable Washington wunderkind class...

Posted by Gregory at January 10, 2008 11:30 PM

Comments

He might observe that no one named Kagan or O'Hanlon is running for President just now. I know the thought occurred to me.

Posted by: Zathras at January 10, 2008 11:42 PM | Permalink to this comment

Funny Zathras, because if it were me....I would tend to focus on the fact that those running for Pres, and, more narrowly, those that often WIN the presidency, seem to lean on "wunderkind" like these two.

Posted by: jonst at January 11, 2008 07:39 AM | Permalink to this comment

O'Hanlon may not be running for President, but he's among other prominent neo-con lites on HRC's FP team.

O'Hanlon was shown to be an untrustworthy slimeball in his last editorial in the Times.

First he goes to Iraq for a few days, during which he subjects himself exclusively to the Petraeus marketing department. He speaks with virtually no one not selected by US forces.

Then he comes back and writes the ed singing the praises of the surge.

The right-wing press and blogosphere have a field day, saying that even O'Hanlon, who originally opposed the war, and who is a fellow at the LIBERAL Brookings institute now agrees the surge is a success. This, of course, proves that anyone who still opposes the war, or the surge, is an agent of OBL.

O'Hanlon allows himself to be (falsely) described as opposed to the Iraq war. He issues no clarification, even though his early support was total.

O'Hanlon dwells almost exclusively on the military aspect of the surge, downplaying the total failure of the Iraq government to achieve the political goals that President Bush swore the Maliki govt would be held accountable for.

O'Hanlon appears to be just another Villager who is trying to salvage his reputation in the face of being wrong about the war (really about the appropriate role of the US in the world), and positioning h/s for a position in a Clinton WH.

Glenn Greenwald's coverage of O'Hanlon NYT editorial at the time was, as usual, superb, fact-based, and scathing.

Posted by: Adams at January 11, 2008 06:06 PM | Permalink to this comment

"Regret that day" hmm? There's rumored to be a tall Saudi who seems to be doing okay in those mountains, not to mention a whole bunch of troublemakers from Pakistan as well. I guess there wasn't really anything else he could conceivably say...

Posted by: TG at January 11, 2008 08:03 PM | Permalink to this comment

Musharraf is responsible for Whatever happened in Pakistan in the last six to seven years. But he used blame others for some happenings in the border, which is completely unacceptable.
Roadside Assistance

Posted by: John at January 19, 2008 06:31 AM | Permalink to this comment

	« More Predictions \| Main \| Straits of Hormuz » January 10, 2008 Quotable Musharraf, to the Straits Times: "I challenge anybody coming into our mountains. They would regret that day". Excerpts: MR PERVEZ Musharraf, Pakistan's embattled president, warned that any unilateral intervention in his country by coalition forces fighting in Afghanistan would be treated as an invasion. Unless agreed to by Pakistan, any entry by the United States or coalition forces into Pakistan's tribal areas would be resisted as a breach of Pakistan's sovereignty, Mr Musharraf told The Straits Times in his first interview with a newspaper since the assassination of Ms Benazir Bhutto on Dec 27. Four American politicians, all Democrats contending for the party's nomination for the race to the White House, have called for US forces now in neighbouring Afghanistan to join the Pakistan Army's counter-insurgency campaign and to hunt down Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan's tribal areas. President Musharraf slammed the 'perception in the United States (that) what our army cannot do, they can do'. Added the president: 'I challenge anybody coming into our mountains. They would regret that day.' Mr Musharraf also took issue with US Senator Hillary Clinton's proposal, made on the eve of her New Hampshire primary victory, to place Pakistan's nuclear weapons under supervision by the US and the UK. Her statement, the president said, was 'an intrusion into our privacy, into our sensitivity... She doesn't seem to understand how well-guarded these assets are'. And I can't help wondering what Pervez would make of op-eds like this one, so energetically penned by notables among our estimable Washington wunderkind class... Posted by Gregory at January 10, 2008 11:30 PM Comments He might observe that no one named Kagan or O'Hanlon is running for President just now. I know the thought occurred to me. Posted by: Zathras at January 10, 2008 11:42 PM \| Permalink to this comment Funny Zathras, because if it were me....I would tend to focus on the fact that those running for Pres, and, more narrowly, those that often WIN the presidency, seem to lean on "wunderkind" like these two. Posted by: jonst at January 11, 2008 07:39 AM \| Permalink to this comment O'Hanlon may not be running for President, but he's among other prominent neo-con lites on HRC's FP team. O'Hanlon was shown to be an untrustworthy slimeball in his last editorial in the Times. First he goes to Iraq for a few days, during which he subjects himself exclusively to the Petraeus marketing department. He speaks with virtually no one not selected by US forces. Then he comes back and writes the ed singing the praises of the surge. The right-wing press and blogosphere have a field day, saying that even O'Hanlon, who originally opposed the war, and who is a fellow at the LIBERAL Brookings institute now agrees the surge is a success. This, of course, proves that anyone who still opposes the war, or the surge, is an agent of OBL. O'Hanlon allows himself to be (falsely) described as opposed to the Iraq war. He issues no clarification, even though his early support was total. O'Hanlon dwells almost exclusively on the military aspect of the surge, downplaying the total failure of the Iraq government to achieve the political goals that President Bush swore the Maliki govt would be held accountable for. O'Hanlon appears to be just another Villager who is trying to salvage his reputation in the face of being wrong about the war (really about the appropriate role of the US in the world), and positioning h/s for a position in a Clinton WH. Glenn Greenwald's coverage of O'Hanlon NYT editorial at the time was, as usual, superb, fact-based, and scathing. Posted by: Adams at January 11, 2008 06:06 PM \| Permalink to this comment "Regret that day" hmm? There's rumored to be a tall Saudi who seems to be doing okay in those mountains, not to mention a whole bunch of troublemakers from Pakistan as well. I guess there wasn't really anything else he could conceivably say... Posted by: TG at January 11, 2008 08:03 PM \| Permalink to this comment Musharraf is responsible for Whatever happened in Pakistan in the last six to seven years. But he used blame others for some happenings in the border, which is completely unacceptable. Roadside Assistance Posted by: John at January 19, 2008 06:31 AM \| Permalink to this comment		Reviews of Belgravia Dispatch "Awake" --New York Times "Always-Worth Reading" --Andrew Sullivan Recent Entries A Brief (and Belated) Word on Chas Freeman What Would Real--Rather Than Rhetorical--Change in U.S. Foreign Policy Look Like? Of War, and Tent Hospitals The Obama Imperative Some Addt'l Thoughts Re: Georgia McCain: Let's Compound the Blunder! Georgia On My Mind Should We De-Emphasize The Terror Threat in U.S. Foreign Policy? (Very Belated) In-House News Straits of Hormuz Search Search this site: About the Author Email the Author English Language Media New York Times Financial Times The Economist The Times The Spectator Daily Telegraph The New Yorker Washington Post New Criterion New Republic National Review The Atlantic The American Conservative Harpers The Week The Guardian Weekly Standard The Nation WSJ Opinion Matt Drudge Real Clear Politics Foreign Affairs Commentariat Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy Le Monde Diplomatique National Interest Non-English Language Press Le Figaro Le Monde El Pais Pravda The Blogs Across the Aisle Marc Ambinder America Abroad American Footprints The American Scene Armavirumque Bainbridge Jack Balkin Becker-Posner Balloon Juice &C (TNR) Phil Carter Chequer-Board Steve Clemons Juan Cole The Corner Crooked Timber Cunning Realist Clive Davis Brad DeLong Democracy Arsensal Daniel Drezner Kevin Drum James Fallows Glenn Greenwald Nikolas Gvosdev Hendrik Hertzberg Huffington Post Mickey Kaus Mark Kleiman Joshua Landis Daniel Larison Josh Marshall Eric Martin Obsidian Wings Oxblog Foreign Policy's Passport The Plank Post Global Gideon Rachman Romenesko Laura Rozen Andrew Sullivan James Taranto Katrina vanden Heuvel Volokh Conspiracy James Wolcott Matthew Yglesias Law & Finance Barron's Bloomberg Bull and Bear Wise Calculated Risk CBS Marketwatch Contrary Investor Corporate Counsel Blog Corp Law Blog DealBreaker Deal Lawyers Blog Financial Sense Forbes Fortune Hussman Funds Bruce MacEwen Gretchen Morgenson Floyd Norris Barry Ritholz Nouriel Roubini Safe Haven SCOTUS Blog The Street 10b-5 Daily Yahoo Finance Think Tanks AEI Baker Institute Brookings Carnegie Cato CFR CSIS Heritage IISS Intl Crisis Group USIP Security Janes Fed. American Scientists Defense Tech Global Security Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Books LRB NYRB NYT Book Review Paris Review TLS Granta Grand Street Arts & Letters Daily The City Curbed Eater Gothamist NY Magazine NY Post NY Press New York Observer On The Inside Tribeca Trib Vanishing NY Village Voice Archives March 2009 January 2009 November 2008 August 2008 July 2008 May 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 Syndicate this site: Belgravia Dispatch Maintained by: www.vikeny.com Powered by

	© 2007 Belgravia Dispatch